98 lines
3.3 KiB
JavaScript
98 lines
3.3 KiB
JavaScript
"use strict";
|
|
|
|
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", {
|
|
value: true
|
|
});
|
|
exports.default = void 0;
|
|
|
|
var _experimentalUtils = require("@typescript-eslint/experimental-utils");
|
|
|
|
var _utils = require("./utils");
|
|
|
|
const isBooleanLiteral = node => node.type === _experimentalUtils.AST_NODE_TYPES.Literal && typeof node.value === 'boolean';
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks if the given `ParsedExpectMatcher` is a call to one of the equality matchers,
|
|
* with a boolean literal as the sole argument.
|
|
*
|
|
* @example javascript
|
|
* toBe(true);
|
|
* toEqual(false);
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {ParsedExpectMatcher} matcher
|
|
*
|
|
* @return {matcher is ParsedBooleanEqualityMatcher}
|
|
*/
|
|
const isBooleanEqualityMatcher = matcher => (0, _utils.isParsedEqualityMatcherCall)(matcher) && isBooleanLiteral((0, _utils.followTypeAssertionChain)(matcher.arguments[0]));
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Checks if the given `node` is a `CallExpression` representing the calling
|
|
* of an `includes`-like method that can be 'fixed' (using `toContain`).
|
|
*
|
|
* @param {CallExpression} node
|
|
*
|
|
* @return {node is FixableIncludesCallExpression}
|
|
*/
|
|
const isFixableIncludesCallExpression = node => node.type === _experimentalUtils.AST_NODE_TYPES.CallExpression && node.callee.type === _experimentalUtils.AST_NODE_TYPES.MemberExpression && (0, _utils.isSupportedAccessor)(node.callee.property, 'includes') && (0, _utils.hasOnlyOneArgument)(node); // expect(array.includes(<value>)[not.]{toBe,toEqual}(<boolean>)
|
|
|
|
|
|
var _default = (0, _utils.createRule)({
|
|
name: __filename,
|
|
meta: {
|
|
docs: {
|
|
category: 'Best Practices',
|
|
description: 'Suggest using `toContain()`',
|
|
recommended: false
|
|
},
|
|
messages: {
|
|
useToContain: 'Use toContain() instead'
|
|
},
|
|
fixable: 'code',
|
|
type: 'suggestion',
|
|
schema: []
|
|
},
|
|
defaultOptions: [],
|
|
|
|
create(context) {
|
|
return {
|
|
CallExpression(node) {
|
|
if (!(0, _utils.isExpectCall)(node)) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
expect: {
|
|
arguments: [includesCall],
|
|
range: [, expectCallEnd]
|
|
},
|
|
matcher,
|
|
modifier
|
|
} = (0, _utils.parseExpectCall)(node);
|
|
|
|
if (!matcher || !includesCall || modifier && modifier.name !== _utils.ModifierName.not || !isBooleanEqualityMatcher(matcher) || !isFixableIncludesCallExpression(includesCall)) {
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
context.report({
|
|
fix(fixer) {
|
|
const sourceCode = context.getSourceCode(); // we need to negate the expectation if the current expected
|
|
// value is itself negated by the "not" modifier
|
|
|
|
const addNotModifier = (0, _utils.followTypeAssertionChain)(matcher.arguments[0]).value === !!modifier;
|
|
return [// remove the "includes" call entirely
|
|
fixer.removeRange([includesCall.callee.property.range[0] - 1, includesCall.range[1]]), // replace the current matcher with "toContain", adding "not" if needed
|
|
fixer.replaceTextRange([expectCallEnd, matcher.node.range[1]], addNotModifier ? `.${_utils.ModifierName.not}.toContain` : '.toContain'), // replace the matcher argument with the value from the "includes"
|
|
fixer.replaceText(matcher.arguments[0], sourceCode.getText(includesCall.arguments[0]))];
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
messageId: 'useToContain',
|
|
node: (modifier || matcher).node.property
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
exports.default = _default; |